abstract
This paper aims to use presence as an analytical framework to conduct a structural rethink of spiritual practice. The article believes that the core dilemma of practice is not the lack of a certain special experience or realm, but the concealment of "directionality" and the loss of "presence". By introducing core concepts such as "direction precedes content","return as redirection mechanism", and "boundary as self-sustaining condition", this paper attempts to outline a deep logical structure shared by spiritual practice: it is not a one-way path to the distance, but a continuous cycle of "identification and masking-interruption of inertia-return confirmation" around the "base presence". The discussion of this paper will strictly follow the descriptive and structural principles of presence thought, and will not provide ultimate answers or conduct psychological analysis. It will only focus on clarifying the internal directional structure of practice as an existential practice.
text
Section 1: Modern dilemmas and structural problems in spiritual practice
In the modern context, spiritual practice often faces an inherent tension. On the one hand, it is promised as a path to inner peace, wisdom and even liberation; on the other hand, practitioners generally experience a cyclical frustration, the so-called "retreat"-the clarity and tranquility gained in specific situations (such as meditation, retreat), once they return to the torrent of daily life, are quickly covered by anxiety, inertia, and complex thoughts. This frustration often leads to self-doubt: Is it the wrong method or is it not enough effort?
However, if we move beyond our attachment to specific experiences (such as lasting tranquility) and look at the structure of the dilemma itself, we discover a deeper problem: it reveals the fundamental separation between "experience content" and "place of existence." A practitioner may "gain" certain content (peaceful experience) at a certain moment, but fail to firmly "live" in a place that can continuously generate and accommodate various experiences.position。This loss of position, or "absence", is a microcosm of the dilemma of modern people and the core fog that spiritual practice attempts to penetrate. 2 Therefore, to rethink practice, we first need to shift it from the pursuit of mysterious "content" to the exploration and maintenance of a fundamental "sense of position" or "sense of direction."
Section 2: The core lens of presence thought: direction, content and return
Present thinking provides a precise set of conceptual tools for analyzing the above structural questions 12:
Presence and base:"Presence" is not a special mental state, but refers to the ability of an individual to maintain his or her own thoughts in actions and experiences.existence positionwithfundamental directionawareness. This location, the "basic presence", is the pre-objective background in which all experiences occur. Practice is not about "creating" a new presence, but ratheridentifyand return toThis pre-existing foundation.
Directionality comes before content: Directionality is the sense of "where to go" that people already have before thinking about "what to do"(content). It is the source of meaning. The common loss in practice lies in replacing or concealing that more fundamental and personalized life with "content" such as specific practice goals (such as "meditating for three hours"), experiential pursuits (such as "seeing the light"), or conceptual understanding (such as "understanding voidness")direction。Content will be complete, change, and boring, but the sense of direction is the constant background sound.
Identification and masking:"Identification" is the core action of presence thought, which refers to the differentiated "seeing" of direction and content, base and covering. The flying thoughts, ups and downs of emotions, and fixed self-identification during practice are all "contents" that may obscure the presence of the foundation. Identification is not an analysis of its causes (that's psychology), but a simple realization: "At this moment, my attention is occupied by the content of 'anxiety' and is thus far away from the tranquility of the base."
Returns as redirection mechanism: Present thoughts believe that the ability more important than moving forward isreturn。Return is not to retreat or give up, but to actively stop inertial participation after perceiving a deviation (obscured by content), return to the boundary, and confirm the fundamental direction. 2 It is the structural driving force for the continuation and deepening of practice, transforming one-time "experiences" into repeatable "abilities."
borders asself-sustainingconditions: Boundaries ensure that individuals are not separated by infinite content, whether external demands or internal thoughts. In practice, it is reflected in guarding the practice time, shelving irrelevant thoughts, focusing on specific methods, and even maintaining inner awareness in interpersonal interactions without being completely swept away. Boundaries are not indifferent isolation, but ones that maintain inner directionality without interruption or dilution.structural conditions1。
Section 3: Practice as a structural cycle of "identity-interrupt-return"
Based on the above concepts, we can reconstruct the essence of spiritual practice into a dynamic, circular structural process:
Identification and masking (bright): The starting point of practice and the trigger point of each cycle is the awareness of "directional masking". This requires practitioners to develop the ability to "take a step away" and recognize, in the inertia of daily thoughts, emotions and behavior, those "coverings" that are attracting all attention and making people forget about the underlying presence. The marking idea in mindfulness and the "examination" in Confucianism are all activating this kind of recognition. The key is not to judge the quality of the content, but to see clearly the structural fact that "content is occupying the home court".
Interruption of inertia (boundary operation): After recognition, the natural reaction is often resistance or addiction. And the structural action isinterrupt--That is, perform a boundary operation to stop the energy supply and narrative entanglement of the obscured content. This is not suppression (another form of participation), but simply stopping the interaction like putting down an irrelevant book in your hand. The essence of Buddhism's "not taking or giving up" and Taoism's "inaction" lies in this proactive and non-cooperative interruption, creating space for the next step.
Return confirmation (redirect): After inertia is interrupted, attention is relaxed from the specific content, and a "sense of space" or "blank feeling" may naturally emerge. This is not a new state created by hard work, but rather a new state that is temporarily removedbase presencere-emergence. At this time, directly feel the feeling of "existence itself" and complete a return contact with the directional source. This action confirms that direction has never been lost, just ignored.
Carry inspection and re-entry（self-sustainingSexual participation): Cultivation does not end in an isolated island of tranquility. The real test and deepening lies in the fact that we have just reconfirmeddirectional awareness(i.e., the background perception of the underlying presence), and once again devote themselves to the concrete aspects of life and relationshipscontentAmong them. At this point, action is no longer an unconscious response, but a response arising from a clear sense of location. When occluded again, the loop starts again. Stability is reflected in the sensitivity and proficiency of the "lost-return" cycle.
This cyclic structure reveals that the results of practice should not only be measured by the uniqueness or persistence of the "experience content", but should also be reflected in this kind of experience.Structural capabilitiesEnhancement of: that is, to identify obscurances more keenly, to interrupt inertia more decisively, to return to the base more quickly, and to observe life more stably.
Section 4: Dialectical Examination: Enlightenment and Self-Limitations of Frameworks
Examining practice from a structural perspective of presence thoughts brings several enlightenments:
Demystification and operability: It pulls practice from a mysterious "realm" pursuit and back to a descriptive and practical one.fabric actionsLevel reduces confusion and secularism caused by differences in terminology and experience.
Normalization of difficulties:"Retreat" is no longer a sign of failure, but an inevitable and necessary link in the cycle of practice. It is an inevitable "cover-up" after "reentry" into life, thus turning the practitioner's energy from self-criticism to understanding and acceptance of the process.
Integration and differentiation: This structural framework reveals the deep resonance of different practice traditions in their ultimate orientation (return to the foundation, reduction and concealment), while respecting their rich differences in "content" levels such as cultural expression, specific techniques, and ethical teachings. It provides a metalanguage for dialogue rather than a unified operation manual.
At the same time, we must adhere to this framework.self-limitingto prevent it from being alienated:
Not replacing specific traditions: The structural framework is the "map", while specific traditions provide all the supplies, scenery and companions needed to walk. Abandoning specific traditional practices, history and communities, frameworks will become empty speculation.
No commitment to experience content: The framework describes the path structure of "how to return" and does not guarantee what specific peace, joy or wisdom experience will be achieved after return. The results are open.
Be wary of framework alienation: The framework of "identity-interrupt-return" must be prevented from being regarded as a new "content" that requires persistence and attachment. It should always serve as aTools to help self-awareness, not another "truth" that needs to be practiced.
conclusion
Through the lens of presence thought, spiritual practice presents its clear and profound structural core: it is a systematic effort to confront the modern existential dilemma of "absence." The core is not what to gain, butregressionWhat; not to keep moving forward, but tocontinuous return。What practitioners hone is ultimately a kind of ability to continuously identify their own position, protect their inner direction, and have the courage to calibrate and return time and time again in the flow of life.Existence of resilience。This resilience may be more fundamental and precious than any short extraordinary experience. It reminds us that the true direction lies not in the distance, but in every honest interruption and return.