abstract
Different spiritual traditions-Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Sufi, Christian mysticism-differ greatly in external forms, language systems, and cultural backgrounds, but they seem to point to the same position in their deep structure: a fundamental existence that cannot be established, cannot be consumed, can be covered but cannot be destroyed. Based on previous comparative analysis of concepts such as "presence","root","vitality","conscience","Tao","emptiness" and "awareness", this paper extracts the common characteristics of this foundation, and then examines how traditions build their practical paths around this foundation. The study found that, despite varying forms, each traditional core method can be reduced to a response to the same set of operating logic: identifying obscurances, stopping stacking, and turning to direct contact. This discovery provides a testable framework for cross-traditional spiritual dialogue.
1 Introduction
The differences between practice traditions are significant. Buddhists talk about "emptiness", Taoism talks about "Tao", Confucianism talks about "conscience", Sufi talks about "the inner aspect of God", and Christian mysticism talks about "the night of the soul." These terms are not compressible, and the metaphysical systems they belong to are different.
But if we put aside metaphysical differences for a while and focus instead on "what practitioners do" and "what states they are exposed to," a cross-traditional structural similarity will emerge. In different traditions, practitioners ultimately describe a state that cannot be spoken but can be contacted. It cannot be defined, objectified, or grasped logically, but it can be experienced, perceived, and checked. It was there, just covered. It is not acquired through accumulation, but becomes manifest through the removal of coverages.
This article attempts to systematize this observation. First, we summarize the common characteristics of fundamental concepts; second, extract the common practice operations corresponding to these characteristics; then, taking Buddha, Tao, Confucianism, Sufi, and Christian mysticism as examples to show how various traditions build paths around these operations; Finally, discuss the theoretical significance and practical boundaries of this framework.
2 Common characteristics of basic concepts
In historical discussions, the following concepts have been repeatedly described as having a structure of "inherent, coverable, and indestructible": presence, root, vitality, conscience, Tao, emptiness, awareness, background "truth", and self. Although they have different names, they share the following characteristics:
2.1 cannot be established
These concepts are not "acquired" through any practice, accumulation, or external input. You cannot "create" presence,"cultivate" roots, and "collect" vitality. Any effort to establish them is an attempt to establish where you are already. Cultivation is not "arriving", but "returning".
2.2 cannot be consumed
No matter what you experience, they will not diminish. Vitality will not be depleted due to fatigue, presence will not disappear due to distraction, and conscience will not be lost due to mistakes. Consumption occurs only at measurable levels-energy, time, attention-and not at the basal level.
2.3 Can be overwritten, but not destroyed
Coverage includes: persistent thoughts, strong emotions, reliance on external reference, pursuit of output and results, and expectations for external evaluation. When the covering appears, the substrate becomes inaccessible, but it itself does not change. After the cover is removed, the substrate returns to an accessible state.
2.4 cannot be objectified
These concepts are not objects to observe. Once you try to observe presence, it is no longer a background condition, but is objectified. The action of observing itself relies on it as a condition. You can notice it, but you can't observe it like a cup.
2.5 where logic fails
When you try to define, analyze, and prove them with logic, logic will enter a state of inversion, infinite circulation, and non-existence. This is not a failure of logic, but that logic has reached its own boundaries-because logic needs distinguishable objects, and they are before objects are differentiated.
2.6 It can only be confirmed through direct contact
They cannot be verified through inference, argument, or description by others. You can only check in person: pause and judge and directly feel "whether I am still here". The inspection itself does not require external standards, because the perception of "I'm still here" is confirmation.
3 General method: operating logic corresponding to characteristics
These characteristics themselves already contain the operating path leading to them. Each type of "no…" corresponds to a type of "how to...":
| features | Corresponding general method |
|---|---|
| cannot be established → not achieved through accumulation | Stop "increasing" and turn to "reducing" |
| cannot be consumed → not maintained through replenishment | Stop trying to "maintain" |
| Can be covered → Remove the cover | Identify the overlay (judgment, reference, reliance) |
| cannot be objectified → not contacted as objects | Don't try to "see" it, but "in" it |
| Logic failure → turn at logic stop | Pause reasoning and make direct contact |
| Only direct confirmation → direct inspection | Pause to confirm whether it is still there |
These six operating logics are expressed in different forms in different traditions. Together, they point to a unified direction of practice:It is not to add something, but to remove obscurity; it is not to achieve something, but to return to what is there; it is not to understand something, but to contact directly.
4 Correspondence of traditional cultivation paths
4.1 Taoist
The Taoist path is centered on "loss". "Tao Te Ching" said: "As we learn more and more, we lose more and more, and we lose more and more, so that we do nothing." This is the most direct expression for "removing the covering." "Increasingly" means increasing knowledge, skills, and judgment;"daily loss" means reducing coverage. "Damage plus loss" does not approach Tao through accumulation, but through impairment. When the covering is removed to a certain extent, the Tao appears on its own.
Zhuangzi's "Xinzhai" and "sitting and forgetting" also point in the same direction. "Heart Zhai" means "if one will, without hearing, listen with the ears but listen with the heart, without hearing with the heart but listen with the qi"-remove the external senses and internal judgments in turn until it touches the lower level of reception. state. "Sitting and forgetting" means "losing limbs, removing wisdom, leaving the body to know, and being the same as pursuing"-leaving the body, abandoning knowledge and opinion, and communicating with Tao. These operations are all performing the same thing: removing the covering.
4.2 Buddhist
The path of Buddhism is centered on "house" and "view". The practice of the four thoughts-observing the body as unclean, observing the suffering, observing the impermanence of the mind, and observing the Dharma without self-is essentially identifying the covering: the attachment to the body, feelings, thoughts, and concepts. When these attachments are recognized, they no longer occupy the background.
The "illumination" in "Illuminating the Five Khans are Empty" in "Heart Sutra" is not an inferential observation, but a direct illumination-without judgment or conceptual processing, it directly contacts the reality of the five Khans. "Emptiness" is not a state that can be defined, but a base position that naturally appears after the attachment is removed.
Zen's "not writing" and "pointing directly to the heart" directly bypass the logical level and point to direct contact from the operational level. "Meditation Zen" includes both "stop" and "contact" actions: sit quietly, without distinguishing or judging, and directly look after. This is not to approach emptiness through any "addition", but by temporarily halting existing coverings-judgment, distinction, language-and allowing emptiness to manifest itself.
4.3 Confucian
The Confucian path is centered on "sincerity" and "conscience". "The Doctrine of the Mean" said: "Sincerity is the way of heaven; sincerity is the way of man." "Integrity" is not as simple as "honesty", but "the truth is pure"-without adding, concealing, or distorting. It is a direct contact with the "originally true". "To conscience" is not to gain new knowledge through external learning, but to reveal the original conscience by eliminating selfish desires.
Wang Yangming said: "Conscience is what everyone has and does not ask for it from outside." Conscience is not something that needs to be "cultivated", but something that needs to be "let out". Self-desires conceal conscience, and conscience is to remove selfish desires. This is completely consistent with other traditional "removing the cover" structures. Confucianism's "tempering in things" is not to "gain" anything by doing things, but to identify the intervention of selfish desires and remove the attachment of selfish desires in the process of doing things, so that conscience can appear in specific situations.
4.4 Sufi and Christian mysticism
In the Sufi tradition,"Dhikr"(chanting) is an operation to clear out distractions by repeating the divine name. Similar to Buddhism holding a name and chanting Buddha, it does not "establish" anything, but occupies the position of the covering through continuous concentration, making the covering unable to continue to function, thereby allowing the foundation to appear.
Apophatic Theology in Christian mysticism maintains that God cannot be grasped by any affirmative description. All you can say is "it's not..." This is the attitude of admitting logic failure at logical boundaries. It does not attempt to approach God through positive definition, but through constant negation, it makes God appear as the inexpressible. What Master Eckhardt called the "fortress of the soul"-a position that is not touched by any images, concepts, desires-is exactly the position of the foundation. Entering the "dark night of the soul" is removing all dependence on objects of perception, entering a state that cannot be marked with anything, and allowing contact to occur.
4.5 Contemporary mindfulness and psychotherapy
In contemporary Mindful Stress Relief (MBSR) and Acceptance Commitment Therapy (ACT), a core operation is to "shift attention from content to process" or "dissociate recognition and cognition." For example, in ACT, rather than verifying the validity of the idea "I'm sad" by making a logical judgment, it adjusts the relationship with content by observing the process of "I'm having this idea." This operation is essentially performing "suspending the judgment of content" and "identifying the relationship between content and reception conditions", thereby reducing unnecessary attachments.
These methods-whether from the East or the West-all share the same structure: not changing the content, but changing the relationship to the content; not solving the problem by increasing knowledge, but restoring the connection to the substrate by identifying attachments, reducing attachments, and direct contact.
5 Systematic induction: A unified framework for practice paths
Based on the above comparison, we can extract a unified cross-traditional practice framework:
Phase 1: Identification
Identify the presence of coverings. Coverage includes: continuous judgment, reliance on external reference, pursuit of output and effect, and need to be seen. In mindfulness, this is expressed as "awareness of thoughts"; in Confucianism, it is expressed as "review and governance"; in Taoism, it is expressed as "knowledge and stop".
Phase 2: Stop
Stop the operation of the mulch. Not to "eliminate" them-because they may appear naturally-but not to persist in adhering to them when they appear. This is manifested in the Buddhist tradition of "not taking or giving up", the Taoist tradition of "loss", the Confucian tradition of "self-denial", and the Sufi tradition of "Dhikr" to empty the mind.
Stage 3: Contact
When the cover is temporarily removed, the substrate appears on its own. It's not "finding" it, it's just that it was there and was covered before. The method of contact is direct inspection-not through logic, reasoning, or external reference, but directly confirming whether "it is still there".
Phase 4: Reentry and stabilization
Covering will appear again during daily activities. This is not a failure, but the continuity of practice. Through repeated practice, the speed of identification of covering is accelerated, the duration of covering is shortened, and contact becomes more stable. Confucianism's "movement and movement are determined", Buddhism's "walking, dwelling, sitting and lying are Zen", and Taoism's "Tao cannot be separated for a moment" all point to the same state: repeatedly returning to the basic position in different situations, and being able to continue to participate in activities after returning.
These four stages are not in a linear sequence. Identify, stop, contact, re-enter-they can be cycled. You may go through multiple cycles in one practice. Each cycle of feedback may bring new basis for judgment, but after the practice is over, judgment can be temporarily put aside.
6 Discussion: Boundary and Test of Theory
The value of this unified framework is that it provides a reference point for cross-traditional dialogue. Traditions can find each other's place in this framework without having to declare "my path is unique" or "our goal is the same."
But it also has clear boundaries:
Not replacing specific traditions: A unified framework is not a "super practice". It is just a reference for understanding the common structure of different methods. The specific operations still have to be returned to various traditional systems and can only be mastered through training and practice.
Do not eliminate practical differences: Different traditions have huge differences in specific operating details, sequencing arrangements, and verification standards. These differences are meaningful. They correspond to the matching methods of different cultures, different roots, and different historical conditions.
"Arrival" is not guaranteed: A unified framework can explain why these methods work, but it cannot replace the methods themselves. Just as knowing the concept of "removing covering" does not mean being able to remove covering.
If this framework holds, it should allow a testable corollary: a practitioner who does not understand any tradition, if he can practice following the steps of "identifying coverings-stopping attachment-direct contact-repeated return", should also be exposed to similar conditions.
conclusion
The terms used in each practice tradition are different-presence, root, vitality, conscience, Tao, emptiness, awareness, underlying truth, and self-nature-but their structural characteristics are the same: inherent, coverable, and indestructible. Focusing on these characteristics, the methods developed in various traditions can all be understood as responses to the same set of operating logic: identifying covers, removing covers, stopping additional judgments, and direct contact.
This is not to say that all traditions are "actually the same." They differ greatly in metaphysics, cultural context, and specific methods. But this suggests that at the operational level, they share an identifiable structure. This structure can be understood as: practice is not about "reaching" anything, but "returning" to a place where you have never left-retouching it by removing obscurity, stopping adding, and inspecting directly.
The value of this framework is not to simplify traditions, but to provide a reference point for cross-tradition dialogue. It neither eliminates differences nor imposes a consensus; it demonstrates a common direction of operation while recognizing differences. Use repeated inspections in practice to verify, rather than theoretical unity to prove.
references
[1]Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching. Chapter 48, Chapter 14, Chapter 25. [2]Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi·Human World (Xinzhai), Great Master (Sitting and Forget). [3]Dragon tree. Chinese commentary. Observe the Four Truths. [4]Kumarashe (translation). Vajra Prajna Paramita Sutra. [5]Xuanzang (translation). Prajna Paramita Multiple Heart Sutra. [6]Wang Yangming. Biography of learning. [7]Zi Si. Doctrine of the Mean. Chapter 20, Chapter 25. [8]Zhu Xi. Collection of Notes to Chapters and Sentences in the Four Books·Chapters and Sentences of the Mean. [9]Huineng. The altar scripture of the sixth ancestor. [10]Eckhardt. The dark night of the soul. [11]Quran. Chapter 13:28 ("What is better than prayer... is remembering God "), Chapter 2:115 (" Wherever you turn, God is there ")[12] Kabir, H. (2004).TheSufi Path of Love. State University of New York Press. [13]Zen master Nhat Hanh. The miracle of mindfulness. Central Compilation and Translation Press. [14] Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999).Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Guilford Press.